Re: Discussing r8708 for 1.0.x

"Erik Huelsmann" <e.huelsmann@gmx.net> writes:
> Since before 1.0.1 r8708 has been nominated in STATUS and at the same time
> being vetoed by breser pending discussion.
>
> Could we have that discussion now in order to be done before 1.0.3 (whenever
> that is), or remove it from STATUS as non-essential?

+1 on removing it. I don't see any reason such a change belongs in a
1.0.x release.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 10 22:28:27 2004