On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:38:31AM +0200, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> writes:
>
> Ben> But until you do write a Pyrex binding set there really isn't
> Ben> anything to talk about further. Nobody on this list seems
> Ben> interested in doing it.
>
> Yes, and neither it seems a good place to talk about your baby, that's
> so perfect. Most of the time, you most are attacking either the place
> where one say something, or his capability to even discuss the matter.
>
> that's all, sorry for the noise.
It's unfortunate that your approach was "attacked" so much. I don't think
there was much call for it. Note that we have both SWIG-based and
manually-written Java bindings in the code today -- our bindings aren't
*all* swig. Under bindings/, we have swig/ and java/. I don't see any
reason why we couldn't also have a bindings/pyrex/.
That said: putting them into the standard distribution is an open
question. Barry's pysvn wasn't included because people didn't really agree
with the approach. I'd suggest that you put together the pyrex-based
bindings and propose them as an alternative set of bindings to live at
bindings/pyrex/. The discussion can then be very concrete about the merits
of putting them in the build, rather than abstract comments about the form
of implementation.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 10 12:22:21 2004