C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
>
>
>>Preferences? I think I side with the last option at the moment, but
>>my opinion is fluid.
>>
>>
>
>Personally, I like the idea of a util library. Candidate contents:
>
> - the node-rev functions
> - svn_fs__canonicalize_path()
> - the current contents of libsvn_fs_base/util (skel stuffs)
>
>
Skels are totally BDB-specific. I don't think any other database backend
would want to use them in favour of a rasonably structured schema.
> - key-gen.[ch] from libsvn_fs_base
> - ??
>
>Also, do we even *need* svn_fs_unparse_id() ?
>
>
Apart from its being used by svnlook? Not really, but IMHO in the future
we'll have to expose the node ID as a public feature of the FS model in
order to efficiently implement (at least) atomic rename in the WC. That
doesn't mean we'll use this particualr function, though.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 3 11:42:34 2004