[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FS abstraction and circular dependencies

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-05-03 11:41:59 CEST

C. Michael Pilato wrote:

>Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>>Preferences? I think I side with the last option at the moment, but
>>my opinion is fluid.
>Personally, I like the idea of a util library. Candidate contents:
> - the node-rev functions
> - svn_fs__canonicalize_path()
> - the current contents of libsvn_fs_base/util (skel stuffs)
Skels are totally BDB-specific. I don't think any other database backend
would want to use them in favour of a rasonably structured schema.

> - key-gen.[ch] from libsvn_fs_base
> - ??
>Also, do we even *need* svn_fs_unparse_id() ?
Apart from its being used by svnlook? Not really, but IMHO in the future
we'll have to expose the node ID as a public feature of the FS model in
order to efficiently implement (at least) atomic rename in the WC. That
doesn't mean we'll use this particualr function, though.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 3 11:42:34 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.