[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is fs_loader.c a mistake?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-04-30 04:12:02 CEST

On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 20:47, Philip Martin wrote:
> "make install" fails because it attempts to install libsvn_fs before
> libsvn_fs_fs (I guess you may not see this if you are installing over
> an existing installation that already provides libsvn_fs_fs).

No, I just only tested with --enable-dso. (make install with
--disable-shared also works, and is easier.)

Unfortunately, I seem to have woven a very tangled web. To solve this
problem with libsvn_ra, we invented the "base-libs" category, which
currently contains libsvn_ra_svn and its dependencies, and ensured (the
wrong way) that base-libs and fs-libs get installed before libs, which
contains libsvn_ra. We can't reuse this category for the current
problem, because now libsvn_ra has to come after libsvn_ra_local which
has to come after libsvn_fs which has to come after libsvn_fs_fs.

I will hopefully have a temporary fix checked in within an hour or so,
and then I will try to untangle the situation.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 30 04:12:25 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.