[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FS abstraction, for real this time

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-04-28 16:34:59 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> Since Josh and I (mostly Josh) now have a fully armed and operational
> FSFS implementation, we'd like to implement the FSAP abstraction part
> of gat's document
> (http://www.cdrguys.com/subversion/htmlPluggable/Pluggable3.htm; focus
> on Appendix C and ignore types with "_bl_" in the name) so that it can
> live in the same executable as the BDB implementation.


> Although it would be possible to implement all of this inside one big
> happy library, I'm thinking that three separate libraries (loader,
> baseline, FSFS) is probably the right answer.


> (In case anyone is wondering what happened to the "maybe we should
> abstract at the DAG layer instead of at the API layer" thread, I think
> Josh wound up making enough changes to the tree.c functions that such
> an abstraction doesn't really make sense.)

I was, indeed, wondering what happened to this thread -- thanks for

Sorry I'm too busy drowning in other tasks to help out. But if you
have questions, feel free to hit me.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 28 16:39:00 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.