[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs-test "unopened FS object" tests: fair or unfair?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-04-27 23:39:00 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > 1. Create new function, svn_fs_open_berkeley2(), which just does
>
> Okay. I'm creating new generic functions svn_fs_create and svn_fs_open
> anyway, so I'll just make them independent of svn_fs_new(). (And you
> won't be able to create anything other than a BDB FS after an
> svn_fs_new().)

That sounds fine. You might want to make a note in svn_fs_new()'s doc
string about what's going on, so people know why the pattern they
extrapolate seems not to actually match the code :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 28 00:51:36 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.