[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs-test "unopened FS object" tests: fair or unfair?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-04-27 16:50:28 CEST

"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:
> My opinion is to get rid of svn_fs_new. Have the open and create do
> the svn_fs_new work. I talk about it in my document in my API visible
> changes section. I even mention the fact that this test could go away.

This makes sense. A raw, unrepositoried fs object is pretty useless;
I'm not sure why we made them available at all. (Of course, now we'd
have to do the Delicate Deprecation Dance.)

Independently of that, I think it's fine to get rid of the tests Greg
was talking about.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 27 18:03:58 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.