On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 10:45, Glenn A. Thompson wrote:
> > Any reason you're calling it 'libsvn_fs_baseline' instead of
> > 'libsvn_fs_bdb' or something else that indicates it uses berkeley db?
>
> Because, there will be other DB backends using the same abstraction.
> The "inner vtable", will allow other DB backends to be used within the
> current FS implementation.
> I don't believe Greg is working on that part. He's focussing on the
> outer abstraction. Right Greg?
Correct.
My initial plan was that you'd set "fsap-name" in the fs_config passed
to svn_fs_new if you wanted svn_fs_create() to use anything other the
baseline FSAP, and then (in the future) you'd set "fsp-name" if you
wanted the baseline FSAP to use anything other than the BDB FSP. I
recently changed the first part so that you just pass an fsap_name
parameter to the new svn_fs_create() function, but the baseline FSAP
will still probably have to use the fs_config parameter to choose
between FSPs, since there's no other way to get a parameter down to that
level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 26 17:49:22 2004