On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 06:57:09PM -0400, Mark Benedetto King wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 05:03:48PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 17:06, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > > Please note that I am relatively new to the svn codebase, so my
> > > terminology above may look a bit strange. However, I'd like to know if I
> > > am on the right track and if this is a good way to improve the speed of
> > > the blame command. I think this task shouldn't be too hard for a beginner
> > > like me:-)
> >
> > This plan looks sane to me. You may find that performance doesn't
> > improve by as much as you'd hoped for, because blame will still be
> > incurring a round-trip delay for each revision. Breaking that barrier
> > would require a specialized RA function to retrieve all the revs of a
> > file within a certain revision range.
> >
>
Oh, and it would also be nice to use the get_location() function when/if
it actually makes it into the trunk.
Those would be separate changes though, since the performance improvements
could in theory go on the 1.0.x branch, while the new RA function would
have to wait until 1.1.
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 26 01:04:35 2004