Re: FS abstraction, for real this time

On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 16:55, Greg Hudson wrote:
> Although it would be possible to implement all of this inside one big
> happy library, I'm thinking that three separate libraries [...]
[...]
> * Should we have three separate libraries for the loader, baseline
> implementation, and FSFS implementation, or should we have one big
> happy libsvn_fs directory with "baseline" and "fsfs" subdirs[...]

Whoops. If anyone noticed that I was being more long-winded than usual,
the question form of that issue was meant to have been edited out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 25 02:45:51 2004