Re: Implement SRV DNS
From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2004-04-21 18:05:21 CEST
Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Where did you see that? I never heard about problematic implementations
That text I quoted points to a specific problematic implementation; the current
> And about the widelyness, I know Windows 2000 uses SRV records
OK, that's one then (and yes I was already aware of it). I also happen to
> The SRV implementation is also in the TODO list of
And that's zero more. There are plans, there are TODO entries, but there aren't
For example, it would be ideal for a web client to support it, so that web
> I don't see why /one/ implementation, limited because designed to be
My concerns don't merely come from my use of DJBDNS (which does support SRV
In addition, the Subversion client would be required to link to a resolver
John
-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Apr 21 18:05:22 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.