[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

re: Performance issues versus CVS

From: solo turn <soloturn99_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2004-04-19 22:07:00 CEST

> Has anyone seen performance issues such as these?
for import, and full ceckout, i cannot tell, theses operations are so rare. but:

with standard operations (svn up, svn ci) we have issues like that if we use a windows based
client (and 99% here use windows clients).

since 0.33 using linux as client (i just tried with reiserfs) is very fast (10 times as fast as
windows), the slowest thing seems to be the locking process. solaris as client is also fast. and
*nix feels approximately the same speed as cvs, but i did not measure it recently as there is not
much cvs left ;)

but i guess you used unix as client?

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 19 22:07:30 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.