Re: Merging r9212 and r9231

On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:14:59AM +0200, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> Well, it was no "objections merging this with just josander's vote" so
> you could merge it with your own +0 :-)
>
> You can say +0 and say that you like the consept. Then it can be merged.
> Here is why you like the consept:

Somehow I missed this was only a change to the win32 packages stuff...

> If Sussman or Sander makes the binaries (using VC7 and without debug
> symbol files as in 1.0.1), then the installer in wc_1.0.x-branch is
> useless without merging (as it was last time).
> This is not all, VC6 and VC7 ships with diffrent runtime files and the
> installer have to deal with this too. So, please, merge it, the current
> code in wc_1.0.x-branch is for VC6 only!
>
>
> In order to deliver a Windows Setup for 1.0.1, I had to ignore the
> wc_1.0.x-branch (the Windows Installer part of it), making it pretty
> meaningless to use energy on wc_1.0.x-branch at all.

We still haven't officially posted a release yet. If you think this is
important enough I'll merge this change and cut a new release.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org