[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: PROPOSAL: GPG Signing of Releases

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2004-04-10 10:54:33 CEST

--On Thursday, April 8, 2004 10:05 PM -0700 Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> wrote:

> I have to disagree 100%. The arguments so far against it IMHO have been
> repeated talking points of "It's bad".

Sorry, but I have to call you on this. Multiple people have explicitly and at
length have replied to your comments by stating why it is a bad idea to use a
shared key. Yet, you have proffered zero rationale that has convinced me that
your position is correct - most of your comments have ignored the points we
have brought up as to why shared keys are bad and instead focus on your
perceived merits of shared keys. I just do not have the time or desire to
repeat the same emails that I wrote weeks ago on this topic. Anything I have
to say, I've said about three times already. I'm not a broken record, nor
will I pretend to be one.

Using a shared key was a bad idea two weeks ago, and it's a bad idea now. I
dislike that I keep having to repeat this because you keep harping on this
issue when several others as well seem to be in disagreement with your
position as evidenced by the +1s to the plan *not* to use shared keys. --

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 10 09:54:32 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.