[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bad performance with large binary files

From: Folker Schamel <schamel23_at_spinor.com>
Date: 2004-04-07 18:59:52 CEST

> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:24, Folker Schamel wrote:
>>I think I've read that after a revert or after undoing changes
>>the comparison is always necessary for this file.
>>Is this correct?
> Where did you read that?

Didn't find it anymore, I thought it was on the mailing list.

> My understanding is that whenever libsvn_wc discovers that a file is
> unchanged (by brute-force means), it changes the timestamp within the
> .svn/entries file to match the current working-file's timestamp. Thus
> "reinstating" the optimization. Didn't Philip add this feature?

You are right:
Inspecting the implementation of svn_wc_text_modified_p
there is such a test.

Sorry for the confusion...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 7 19:00:34 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.