[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: PROPOSAL: GPG Signing of Releases

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2004-04-07 01:43:31 CEST

--On Tuesday, April 6, 2004 3:08 PM -0700 Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> wrote:

> According to what I presented the only people that would need access to
> the key would be the CollabNet people (presumably only the ones in
> Chicago). If you guys don't trust each other then I think we have other
> problems.

Oh, yuck. We shouldn't be dependent upon the CollabNet folks to sign a

I've maintained before that we shouldn't have a group key and have stated
my rationale previously.

I hereby vote -1 (i.e. non-veto No) against this. I think a shared key is
about the worst thing we could do to solve this problem. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 7 01:43:59 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.