Re: The "follow copy history" initiative

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:39:37 -0500, Folker Schamel <schamel23@spinor.com> wrote:
> It's not only "one scenario", its the standard case:
> If a file has the history of another file,
> this means per definition that it has the same content
> plus modifications, and merging is necessary
> in the same way as for normal modified files.

But how would you ever get those 'plus modifications', if every change you made to either file was
automatically merged to the other?

It sounds like you are describing symlinks, not file copies.

-- 
Ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org