[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Is it woth to have SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT?

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2004-04-05 15:29:58 CEST

Hi Ulrich,

Given your background with i18n, would you care to shed some
light on how to use xgettext in this situation? Isn't there
some option to make xgettext scan after a preprocessor step?
(I can think of some sideeffects of the preprocessor :( )

Maybe some general advise on how to go about using gettext in SVN?

Thanks,

Sander

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Lichtmaier [mailto:nick@reloco.com.ar]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:59 PM
> To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Is it woth to have SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT?
>
>
> The current use of SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT is not compatible with gettext. Why?
> Because xgettext can't process this:
>
> _("Revision: " SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT "%")
>
> At first thought creating a function... like
> get_human_readable_revision, but... Is it worth? SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT only
> has "ld", which is a standard C thing. It will probably never be
> changed? Isn't this a case of overengineering?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 5 15:30:31 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.