Re: Testing pax on platforms was Re: Using pax instead of cpio in dist.sh
From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
 
Date: 2004-04-03 08:57:04 CEST 
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:00:43AM +0200, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
 *cough* I think you're a little too confident here... I tried pax
 $ gzip -dc subversion-1.0.1.tar.gz | tar xvf -
 file doesn't even think it is a tar file:
 I'll try it on a different machine later.  I tried this on amd64 and
 > The only reason to test pax would be to test for bugs in the one that 
 Given that we've now tried 3 different tar implementations looking for
 > The decision (or even discussion) that we shouldn't have a dedicated RM 
 Well I don't think any decision has been made.  Justin and I both have
 -- Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> http://ben.reser.org "Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking." - H.L. Mencken --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Apr 3 08:57:21 2004  | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.