Re: Testing pax on platforms was Re: Using pax instead of cpio in dist.sh
From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-04-03 08:57:04 CEST
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:00:43AM +0200, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
*cough* I think you're a little too confident here... I tried pax
$ gzip -dc subversion-1.0.1.tar.gz | tar xvf -
file doesn't even think it is a tar file:
I'll try it on a different machine later. I tried this on amd64 and
> The only reason to test pax would be to test for bugs in the one that
Given that we've now tried 3 different tar implementations looking for
> The decision (or even discussion) that we shouldn't have a dedicated RM
Well I don't think any decision has been made. Justin and I both have
-- Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> http://ben.reser.org "Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking." - H.L. Mencken --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Apr 3 08:57:21 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.