[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Gettext real issues

From: Lele Gaifax <lele_at_nautilus.homeip.net>
Date: 2004-04-03 03:06:21 CEST

>>>>> "Branko" == Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

>> First of all gettext provides no way for dealing with this
>> anyway.
    Branko> No, but printf does if LOCALE is set correctly. But only
    Branko> if it actually sees %d in the format string.

Uh? Accordingly to the fprintf manpage, this is done *only* when you
specify a flag, such as "%'d". Glibc adds a further flag, "I", to
denote alternative output digits. But I think this is well beyond the
scope: as already stated in the past, nobody should count on the revid
being a particular number in a particular base, and I think grouping
the thousands character is stressing the nature of the value.

I cannot properly judge the "I" flag case, though.

ciao, lele.

nickname: Lele Gaifax	| Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas	| comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
email: lele@seldati.it	|		-- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 3 03:06:46 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.