Re: Roadmap for 1.1 [placeholder]

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:

> I think we can also get the locking-plan.txt implemented for a 1.1.
> This is probably the 'largest' cross-cutting feature that I think we
> should add into a 1.1. Greg's proposed libsvn_fs_fs shouldn't affect
> everything, but locking would require changes through almost every
> part of the code in some fashion. Perhaps now would be a good time to
> review locking-plan.txt and see if it all still makes sense? (I
> haven't looked at it in detail since we wrote it over 18 months
> ago!)

I've been looking at this document in great detail over the past week
(sorry for not warning anyone). There are several short-comings and
challenges, but I'm sure those can be worked out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 1 00:01:26 2004