Re: Towards a native-FS-backed filesystem

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> > If that's so, then once the abstraction is in place,
>
> Oooooooh. Is *this* is the complexity that I'm "overestimating"?
>
> /me recalls the hours he's spent thinking/writing/having phone calls
> about this very abstraction, and chuckles...

Are you saying you want the abstraction part to happen on a branch, or
Greg's new backend, or both?

I was only saying that I'd prefer Greg's changes to happen on trunk,
since I don't think they'll have many points of interference with
other trunk code (thanks to the abstraction).

I have no opinion on the best way to do the abstraction. Maybe branch
is better for that, dunno.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 30 22:22:44 2004