[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Do not use gettextize and i18n round 2 Re: I18n: The gettext proposal

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-03-30 17:47:01 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> This has been a long-standing point of disagreement between me and the
> svn source code base. As I understand it, the difference between
> #include "foo" and #include <foo> is that the former searches the source
> code file's directory before the include path, and that's it. By
> implication, the only files we should be including with "foo" are the
> directory-private headers like wc.h. But we seem to include all of our
> own headers with "foo".

Wouldn't object to a change, if it bothers you. (I'm not sure how we
settled on the current convention. Your understanding of "" vs <> is
exactly the same as mine... and as K&R's (2nd ed, 4.11.1, p. 88) :-) ).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 30 18:58:29 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.