Re: Towards a native-FS-backed filesystem

"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:

> >Absolutely. IMO, a libsvn_fs filesystem backend is a toy project
> >(sorry if others disagree), but the necessary design modifications
> >overlap with a feature (pluggable DB backends) that is widely
> >desired. It is imperative that we make these design modifications
> >once--and only once--such that all interested parties have the right
> >APIs to play with.
>
> I'm glad you said API(s). Cause I *STILL* see at least two layers.

I hear ya.

> >I'll gladly wrangle libsvn_fs into the necessary state to allow for
> >pluggable backends.
>
> CMike, how out-of-date is my old document? I haven't looked at FS
> code in forever. Man I've got major guilt on this.

The code hasn't changed that drastically.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 30 17:53:29 2004