[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r9168 - trunk/build/ac-macros

From: Erik Huelsmann <e.huelsmann_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2004-03-29 22:06:24 CEST

> > In standalone setups the HEAD of APR/APU_BRANCH_0_9 installs into
> > /usr/local/apr by default. I committed this change in order for it to be
> > ported to the 1.0.x branch for better user experience. (I will nominate
> > it soon.)
> >
> > From discussion on this list, I concluded that these two files are
> copies
> > from the apr(-util) provided ones in the apache CVS repository. Possibly
> > one of the APR developers on the list want to take this commit there
> too?
>
> No. This should probably be reverted. Kevin had that there initially,
> but
> the problem is that libtool can be confused on a previous install when it
> is compiling to that same location. This is why there is the
> 'implicit-install-check'.

Forgive my ignorance, but how is this confusion different if apr is
compiling to /usr/lib from compiling to /usr/local/apr/lib?

I noticed this, since *we* may be distributing apr in our tarball, but I
found some source rpms which did not include the neon or apr{,-util} libraries.
Presumably because those are distributed in other srpms. Although we can't
take just any packager into account, it is not just any user which is
confronted with this "problem".

bye,

Erik.

-- 
+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 29 22:06:43 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.