By "non-javahl version", are you referring to the Subclipse-by-way-of
commandline client wrapping, or something else?
McClain Looney wrote:
> point taken, i had the non-javahl version in mind when I wrote that.
>
> indeed, subclipse currently supports all access layers due to javahl.
>
> On Thursday 25 March 2004 11:04 am, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>>Thanks for stepping up, Patrick!
>>
>>Regarding comment #14 in that issue, from McClain Looney 2004-03-24:
>>"i see no need to support all the funky svn access methods, just http
>>and https". It's true that the http:// and https:// access methods
>>were available first, but the svn:// access method is long out of
>>testing now -- it's quite well established, with sites using it in
>>production.
>>
>>Obviously, if Eclipse uses the javahl bindings, then it gets svn://
>>support for free, so this won't be an issue. I just wanted to point
>>out that svn:// support *is* important, and that therefore using the
>>Subversion clietn libraries should be correspondingly more attractive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 26 05:45:17 2004