Re: Naming of function versions

Greg Hudson wrote:
> It's not really fair to call our approach "unconventional" when
> there is no convention to follow. (Certainly there's none that I'm
> aware of.)

Ah, a mere linguistic mistake on my part I guess. I just meant that it
was not conventional, not that it would be going against a convention.

And you are right, there probably isn't a convention on how such
things are done with programs abiding to the APR versioning document,
since it is stricter than many others.

-- Naked

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 18 17:07:33 2004