[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: vdelta performance

From: Florian Weimer <fw_at_deneb.enyo.de>
Date: 2004-03-18 00:10:36 CET

Jan Bares wrote:

> I compiled and tested the svndiff-test. The results are similar (in fact
> slightly better) to my own delta engine.

I've compared it to xdelta and rdiff. White it is significantly better
than rdiff, it's also worse than xdelta (both compressed and
uncompressed).

xdelta diffing is also faster, but xdelta doesn't seem to use bounded
amounts of memory.

-- 
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, freenet.de, hotmail.com,
libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz,
tiscali.it, voila.fr, wanadoo.fr, yahoo.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 18 00:10:54 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.