Hi Karl,
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>In r9017, Ben Reser and I merged a last-minute javahl bindings fix
>into 1.0.1, pretty close to the release time. The fix, however, had
>been known since r8652 (r9017 is really just McClain Looney's backport
>of the crucial part of r8652).
>
>
I am really sorry about that. I have commited r8652 without realizing
that there was a problem on the 1.0.x branch and fixed it while adding a
bunch of files to the Makefile.am.
>I'm wondering, is there some way we can make it easier to catch such
>problems earlier? If it would help, we could make it part of the
>release process to send out a reminder to try building the bindings on
>the soon-to-be-released branch. If we did that the moment we set the
>date for a release, then bindings fixes could come in much sooner.
>
>If all bindings maintainers read the dev@ list regularly, then we can
>just post the reminder to dev@. Or if not, then we should work out
>something else.
>
>
I am reading dev@.
>Please let me know your thoughts. Last minute backports like this are
>eminently avoidable, if we plan ahead a little more...
>
>Thanks,
>-Karl
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
Again thanks for the quick fix and i am sorry about the mess i created,
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 14 12:53:51 2004