Re: (javahl) bindings maintenance

Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 11:39:59AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>I'd just add 'make javacheck' and/or 'make javahlcheck' targets.
>>
>>If you can get them to work, I'll figure out the build system. ;-)
>
> I'd prefer check-swig-java and check-javahl, they are more consistent
> with our existing targets for bindings.
>
> But I agree they should be separate targets.

Sounds good to me.

Consensus on IRC also seemed to be to keep the actual testing framework for the
bindings separate from the testing framework for the core. This makes sense to
me for the Perl and Java bindings, but slightly less so for the Python bindings.

- Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 12 22:19:54 2004