Re: API/Interface design questions

John Peacock <jpeacock@rowman.com> writes:

> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > I think we are generally encouraging folks to keep the codebase
> > completely free of changes that would force us into 2.0 land, at least
> > until the 1.0.x branch is on life support and the 1.x changes are on a
> > branch.
>
> Sorry, I was not clear. I was proposing only to prepare the ground
> for 2.0. The changes would be API compatible (and so suitable for
> 1.1.0); I was just suggesting that the original function (with new
> pool term) be positioned to go semi-public in the 2.0 timeframe.

Ah. Gotcha. Sorry 'bout that misunderstanding.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 11 04:11:27 2004