Re: [PATCH] Fix reverting a replacement without properties + regression test

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:49:26PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> Your current test probably covers the existing error, but it could do
> more. Without proper error checking it is easy to end up with a test
> that passes even when a bug is present (imagine if a revert bug gets
> introduced such that revert has no effect other than to print
> "Reverted foo").

Updated patch with a better regression test will be posted on issue
#1755 momentarily.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org