kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> "D.J. Heap" <dj@shadyvale.net> writes:
>
>>As far as converting Subversion to use these new functions so they can
>>be truly 'deprecated', I am willing to do that and submit a patch --
>>it should be quite straightforward as far as I can see.
>
>
> Okay -- you're way ahead of me, I hereby back off :-). Go for it,
> I'll watch for the patch here. If you want to mark the old APIs as
> deprecated in the same patch, IMHO that's fine.
>
> -K
Hmm, sorry if I came off as being aggressive about it, I did not mean to
be. I just feel a certain amount of responsibility to see it through
and make sure everyone is happy with it since I was a vocal supporter
and committer. And I certainly didn't want to make more work for
someone else.
I have a patch finished and am running it through the tests now. Are
the function/parameter names ok, or does someone have a better idea?
DJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 10 01:11:45 2004