Re: svn commit: r8935 - branches/1.0.x

On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 16:27, Sander Striker wrote:
> Whether performance is acceptable is ofcourse something subjective
> and rather specific to each site.

Sometimes decision criteria are subjective.

> I personally think that reducing the number of times a file is opened
> and parsed from the number of requests + subrequests (which can be
> quite a lot) to one* can make a substantial difference.

Perhaps. But CPUs are fast and disk reads are cached. Has anyone ever
said, "I tried using mod_authz_svn but had to turn it off because
Subversion got too slow with it on?" If so, I haven't seen it.

> I guess I could go and produce numbers, but I don't really feel that's
> worth the effort.

There's nothing wrong with deciding that it isn't worth the effort, but
that's not going to make me feel guilty. The onus is on the person
proposing the 1.0.x change to show that it meets the criteria for 1.0.x.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 9 22:52:26 2004