On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 19:18, Robert Spier wrote:
> Right. But it might be interesting to do anyway... do we have any way
> of knowing that the MERGE was part of the same "session" as the PUT's?
> They're individual HTTP actions, so the answer may be "no" -- although
> even though the PUTs succeed, the MERGE fails, so the whole
> transaction is never recorded.. so the answer is probably yes. In
> that case, we can open it up only for the scope of the transaction,
> which probably is ok.
>
> One "real world" example of where this is going to bite us is when
> we've given someone access to lib/Foo and tests/ - when they make a
> change to lib/Foo, we also want them to make changes to tests/ and it
> would be grrrrrrrrrreat if that could be one change.
Quick workaround:
<LimitExcept MERGE ...>
SVNAuthzFile ...
</LimitExcept>
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 3 20:11:42 2004