Re: Remarks on backports from STATUS

 
> Huh? What STATUS file are you looking at? I see this:
>
> * Issue #1733, attachment 305
> Backport r8551 to 1.0.X to cause blame to bail on binary files.
> Justification: Nicer behavior to the end user.
> Votes:
> +1: sussman, cmpilato
>
> I don't see your -1...?

In which case it's a good thing that I did not commit it yet...

I'm not vetoing the backposrt, so I won't commit it :-)
 
> And we *have* done a backport that is slightly different from r8551,
> specifically a backport which doesn't create a new error code. We're
> nominating the patch, not r8551 itself. Look at issue #1733. We've
> already been down this road. :-)

bye,

Erik.

-- 
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org