On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 01:47, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 18:36, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > As far as I'm concerned, releasing a 1.0.1 in a week or two is *just*
> > fine. I don't think there is a need to wait "six weeks" or whatever. If we
> > know about problems, then we'll actually be doing a disservice to make
> > people wait a while. "But we'll look bad releasing a 1.0.1 so quicly" Oh,
> > fooey on that. We're grownups and can deal with "looking bad" here and
> > there.
>
> Yah, really, we've got 20+ bugfixes ready to release in 1.0.1. I'd like
> to do it next week if possible.
If we could get an APR release in the meantime that would be helpful,
wouldn't it? ;)
> In general, I don't think we're going to need release 1.0.X releases
> every two weeks, because I doubt we'll have enough bugs to justify it.
> But 1.0.1 is a special case: it represents more than six weeks of
> bugfixing, due to the 1.0 "soak" period. We could have released it the
> day after 1.0 if we had wanted to. :-)
+1.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 27 12:57:40 2004