[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Transactionless reporter again

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2004-02-25 01:33:39 CET

Sander Striker <striker@apache.org> writes:

> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 20:16, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>> However, it might be wise to add this as a conditional part of the
>> build first, e.g.,
>> $ ./configure --enable-txnless-reporter
> Yes, turn it around: --disable-txnless-reporter if you don't want it.
> People tracking trunk are doing so for a reason. Don't you love
> ginea pigs? ;) :)

Either option means that there is twice as much to test. I don't
object to either option, but if the transactionless reporter is the
future and the new code passes the regression tests then I would be
happy for it to replace the current code.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 25 01:33:15 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.