Ben Reser wrote:
>
> I think we'd have a subversion-swig-bindings-1.0.x.tar.gz package.
> Other then that there's the javahl bindigs and com bindings.
> Only the former seems to be maintained. The java swig bindings don't
> seem to be maintained either. I think we should delete the bindings
> that aren't being maintained and put a place holder like the ruby
> bindings. If someone wants to resurrect them they can always cp the old
> versions and start working on them again.
...
I'd like to keep the SWIG/Java bindings around for a while longer in hopes
that I someday find time to work on them again. It's a lower barrier for me
if I don't have to constantly resurrect them. I wouldn't be comopletely
adverse to moving them to a branch, but I'm unconvinced of the benefit of that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 20 21:05:31 2004