Re: [UPDATED] was Re: [POST 1.0 task] Custom Keywords - Issue 890

On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 12:16, John Peacock wrote:
> Unfortunately, the patch changes some function signatures so that it
> will not be suitable for the 1.1.x development (as I read HACKING), which is a
> great disappointment. I wish I had taken the time to do this several months ago
> so it could have been part of 1.0; now it will hang in limbo until 2.0...

I doubt we would have accepted it for 1.0 several months ago. Maybe a
year ago.

Anyway, I'm sure custom keyword support can be added without changing
any public function signatures. It may not be as pretty, but that's the
cost of API compatibility.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 20 18:27:51 2004