[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Add verbose support to blame

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-02-18 22:24:43 CET

Mark Benedetto King <mbk@lowlatency.com> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:27:34PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 14:50, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > > I think 'svn blame -v' is definitely a cool new thing, but I'm -0.5 for
> > > nominating it for svn 1.0.1.
> > >
> > > svn 1.0.1 is about fixing serious bugs... none of the bugs was serious
> > > enough to hold up the 1.0 release, but they're all still serious.
> >
> > I agree. 1.0.x should not be adding any new features. (We can fix
> > minor bugs as well as serious ones, as long as the fixes are simple, but
> > this is not a fix at all.)
> >
> It's not a big leap to say that a new feature is like a new function;
> downwards compatibility would be broken.

Hmm... perhaps I just remove the --quiet option I just added to
svndumpfilter and save that addition for the 1.1 branch.

I can see how command-line interfaces are similar to APIs, especially
when you think of scripts wrapping our binaries like functions calling
functions. We shouldn't be changing our programs' option contracts or
their output.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 18 22:25:32 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.