[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn update/diff handles renames confusingly

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-02-15 20:44:03 CET

Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com> writes:
> First, you do the update:
> $ svn update
> [bunch of normally updated files]
> svn: Won't delete locally modified file 'old_name_of_file'
> The state of the tree is then bizarre:
> 1. new_name_of_file and old_name_of_file both exist
> 2. new_name_of_file and old_name_of_file are neither versioned nor
> exported

This is very surprising. Can you give a concrete repro script, or at
least describe the series of steps precisely, with real filenames &
URLs and such?

In (2), 'new_name_of_file' ought to be versioned, or
else Subversion is insane... :-) A repro script would help remove any
possible ambiguity from the prose description of events.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Feb 15 21:45:56 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.