[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "not under version control" error - continued

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2004-02-11 22:45:20 CET

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> Ah, sure, that was my first instinct. It fixes the problem and passes
> all regression tests. But the access-baton isn't being examined at all
> anymore...does this change somehow undo some other logic that was going
> on here?

I think it's stuff I wrote, but I can't remember why I chose to use
access_baton rather than b->added, using added looks sensible.

Incidentally, your new regression test doesn't need to call
run_and_verify_merge twice, just set the dry_run argument (the one
after the check_props argument) and the one call to
run_and_verify_merge will do both merges.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 11 22:45:49 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.