RE: RE: "not under version control" error - continued
From: Mike Javorski <mjavorski_at_spokesoftware.com>
Date: 2004-02-11 01:45:47 CET
Any news on this issue? There has been another occurrence of this merge bug reported by Adam Lackorzynski in the dev list (http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=56106)
I am starting to get a bit concerned here.. Merge is a core function for any version control system; if the problem stems from something deeper this could be an even bigger issue, and 1.0 is suppposed to be just around the corner..
I have several people that want to start using our repository and I can't safely let them do that at the moment if their data is being corrupted (possibly)..
I would really appreciate any help you all can give.. Please let me know if there is any further details that would help to diagnose the problem.
Thanks,
- Mike
-----Original Message-----
Anyone have any ideas? Need more info?
Anyone.... Anyone.... Bueller..... :-D
- Mike
-----Original Message-----
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:12:49 -0800, "Mike Javorski" <mjavorski@spokesoftware.com> said: [snip]
The thread in question is here: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=5435
> today that he was having a similar inconsistency between merges with
I do have a reproduction recipe, so it seems this bug is not related to content. Although it seems to be triggered by binary items (non text/* svn:mime-type).
I also reported another issue with --dry-run a long time ago: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=294631
That thread basically said that --dry-run reported an error message that an added file did not exist, instead of simply saying "A file".
Bye !
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.