Philip Martin wrote:
>Branko ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Thus, I prefer that we continue with the "+" marker to mean "this is like
>>>1.0.1, but additional stuff has been changed."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>...this is a problem: both the tip of trunk and the tip of the stable
>>branche(s) must somehow indicate development/unreleased status. In your
>>scheme, right after the 1.0 release, _both_ branches would say "1.0.0+";
>>and worse, after a 1.0.1 release, the stable branch would havs "1.0.1+"
>>and trunk would still have "1.0.0+", which is nonsense to me.
>>
>>
>
>It's unfortunate that they have the same version. However until the
>trunk changes the API/ABI the two versions should be compatible, so
>it's possible to argue that the matching versions are not a problem.
>Once the trunk does break API/ABI compatibilty the it should have it's
>version number increased, and the problem goes away.
>
>
Increased to what, and its development status shown how?
--
Brane Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jan 31 18:18:23 2004