[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: A reply to "Diagnosing SVN"

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-01-29 18:58:11 CET

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> (since the fifthvision list archive is no longer available) and the
> response is at:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/undiagnosing

Whew, that is a truly fine piece of meta-criticism. I loved it, and
hope anyone who encounters Tom's original doc sees your response too.

One excellent & subtle point, picked at random:

   Tom's general assertion that Subversion "underwent fuzzy design
   conceptualization" appears to be a combination of two factors: (1)
   an unfair comparison between what has gone on inside his head in
   the development of Arch (most of which is not written down) and
   what was publically written down during Subversion's development
   and read by him, [...]

Ahem, yes :).

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 29 19:56:45 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.