Re: 1.0.0, 1.0.x plan

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>However, for a clear lineage from 0.37.0->1.0, what I'd like to do is:
>
> 1. Remove the 1.0-stabilization branch, which has had no changes
> since r8509, when josander branched 0.37.0.
>
> 2. Create branches/1.0.0, copied from the 0.37.0 tag.
>
>
I'd suggest simply renaming branches/1.0-stabilization to
branches/1.0.x. The 1.0 series releases shoudl be made straight off this
branch, since it should always remain stable.

(IMHO it was a mistake to create a 0.37.0 branch, but that's counting
birds flown. Obviously any changes that were made on 0.37.0 should be
merged back to 1.0-stabilization.)

[...]

>If we do find a showstopper bug in 0.37.0, then we release 0.37.1 as
>per usual procedures, then run the above algorithm with "0.37.1"
>substituted for "0.37.0". In which case, the four-week countdown
>would start from 0.37.1's release date, not 0.37.0's, of course.
>
>That's all. Thoughts?
>
>
We should define what "showstopper" means, and be very strict about it.
IMHO crashes and data corruption bugs would be the only candidates at
this point.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org