Re: [Issue 1705] apr_off_t is of an ambiguous size
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-01-23 18:31:22 CET
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 01:44, Ben Reser wrote:
I have reviewed this carefully, made sure it compiles without warnings
Hopefully bliss will remove his veto and vote for the patch. We need
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=107481332607151&w=2
for my explanation of why library APIs should avoid using off_t. (That
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.