[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8421 - in branches/1.0-stabilization: . build/ac-macros packages/rpm/mandrake-9.0 packages/rpm/mandrake-9.1 packages/rpm/mandrake-9.2 packages/rpm/redhat-7.x packages/rpm/redhat-8+ subversion/bindings/swig subversion/bindings/swig/perl

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-01-22 20:24:56 CET

Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:
> > Umm this effects the build system, doesn't that require 3 +1s?
> It affects the build system, but it is still a bindings change.
> Do the lowered requirements not apply in that case? If so
> someone can revert the change, but note that that puts us right
> back in the position of potentially publishing bindings that
> aren't the best we have.

If it touches the build system, it needs to be in the full (core)
voting system, three +1's and all. The build system affects

However, let's not take process to the point of counterproductivity
here. We know for next time. In the meantime, I'll review the
relevant portions and retroactively +1 (assuming there are no
problems). Then we'd be only one vote short; I'll bet I can persuade
someone here to look with me, though :-).

Of the three revisions merged together

   r8368 - doesn't affect the core build system
   r8417 - affects the core build system
   r8418 - doesn't affect the build system

So there's really only one to worry about. I'll/we'll take a look.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 22 21:22:11 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.