Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)

On Sunday 11 January 2004 00.58, Philip Martin wrote:
..
> valgrind testing of the branch has revealed two bugs so far. They
> were also present on the trunk and I have fixed them there with r8229
> and r8230.
>
> Another problem is spurious username prompts:
>
> $ grep ^store ~/.subversion/config
> store-password = no
> store-auth-creds = no
> $ svnadmin create repo
> $ svn mkdir -m "" file://`pwd`/repo/foo
> Authentication realm: 7b19ef9d-98d0-0310-9904-a7f57b3cb904
> Username:
>
> I don't think I should be prompted for a username here; I definitely
> don't get prompted if I use the trunk.

Is this three items (r8229, r8230 and the password ting) something that
will stop us from making 0.36.0, or will this be fixed and merged into
the 1.0-stabilization branch before Tuesday (anyone)?

I'm not allowed to vote for stuff in the STATUS file, but I would say
that r8229 and r8230 should come straight into the 1.0-stabilization
branch and the "spurious username prompt" looks like a thing we should
not have in a 1.0 version. Can someone do a quick decision here?

I don't want to make a 0.xx.1 version 8 hours after a x.xx.0 again (it
makes me look like a fool) :-)

Jostein

-- 
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org